this turns any (JPEG) compression into absurdity anyway :-D What does the "view archive with technical details" say about those zipx's ?Īlternatively, ask that guy to send standard ZIP's or 7-ZIP's -)ĭoes the world really need 1'000'000'000'000 incompatible archive formats, every of them with 1'000'000'000'000 flavours? WinZIP 17 is 100 MiB download size. zipīecause you can't reliably distinguish them from each other -) We have a guy who likes Total Commander ?Īnd he always sends me. StiffIT was never open source or publicly documented, IIRC. I heard rumors that they use StaffIT algorithm (Sorry, I can Please upload some examples and test some JPG
> If zipx becomes popular, providing support for it In Win98 could be of value to millions of users.
OPENING ZIPX FILE DRIVERS
> People are still writing drivers and porting new functions to it. > and software that provide minor updates to existing Win98 functions. > planned obsolescence driven by MS to drive profits from replacement hardware For NT/Vista, the facts are not very different. > circulation (key sections of that code go back to 1982!). > It just makes things less secure for the rest of us to have Win9x in > Please do NOT support Win9x-it should die. The ME-line should never have been invented.
For JPEG, I don't know.įor anything else, use 7-ZIP format and ignore WinZIP "technology" -) There is already partial "ZIPX" support in 7-ZIP (no WAVPACK and no JPEGCRAZY).įor audio, just use genuine WAVPACK.
0 kommentar(er)
